Artificial Corner

Artificial Corner

How Google Quietly Took the Lead in the AI Race with Gemini 2.5

This model isn’t just smart on paper

Kevin Gargate Osorio's avatar
Frank Andrade's avatar
Kevin Gargate Osorio and Frank Andrade
Apr 11, 2025
∙ Paid
IQ Test Results

Something feels different this time—it doesn't seem like just another failed launch from Google. I don’t want to downplay the past efforts of the DeepMind team, but the truth is, they didn’t always meet user expectations.

Just a few weeks ago, Google released Gemini 2.5 Pro, and the internet lit up. Maybe not quite as explosively as with DeepSeek or GPT-4o, but still, I have to admit that ever since Google launched DeepResearch, the updates that have followed have been impressive—definitely worth noting.

In a lot of my early tests using prompts, the results were surprisingly strong. Naturally, it was hard not to compare it to other AIs out there.

One example that really stood out to me came from a hospital in Japan, where the same AI technology was used to transcribe and summarize doctors' notes, cutting down nurses’ paperwork time by 42% and helping to ease their stress.

And in lab evaluations, Gemini 2.5 has been able to solve PhD-level science and math problems that had …

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Frank Andrade.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Frank Andrade · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture