This author presents a narrow perspective that echoes similar resistance to technological progress throughout history. Consider the initial rejection of Impressionism by the artistic establishment - a movement enabled by technological advancement (the invention of paint in tubes that allowed artists to work outdoors), just as AI enables new forms of artistic expression today. While we celebrate these works as masterpieces now, at the time, critics too narrow-minded to recognize the dawn of a new artistic age dismissed them as unworthy of being called "art." Imagine if similar voices had prevailed against the printing press - a technology that fundamentally transformed every aspect of human society. We wouldn't even be having this conversation about AI art.
Disruptive technologies reshape our world from top to bottom, with art being just one facet of that transformation. Even within the art world alone, each new tool - from the camera to digital editing software - initially faced skepticism before being embraced as a legitimate medium for creative expression. AI is simply the latest in this long line of innovations. Rather than spelling "the end of art," it represents an expansion of creative possibilities for those willing to explore its potential.
So while critics conduct their insulated debate about the legitimacy of AI as an artistic tool, the point about art is not how it was created - it's whether the result moves, inspires, or challenges us. Throughout history, great art has always been defined by its impact on viewers, not by the tools used to create it.
Artificial Intelligence is not real Art, They have no Soul, Love, Empathy, Creativity (They do not innovate, they only create Colleges), Human Touch and Feelings, Unfortunately you are unaware of the danger you will find yourself in, as you wrote in the Article, it is creating a bubble, when it bursts there will be trouble, Furthermore, Progress can be stopped, indeed, unfortunately history had to teach, but apparently it has not taught anything, A Hacker Attack is enough to stop Progress, they block everything and nothing could happen, everything blocked, This is nothing, there is another thing that can Stop Progress, If a Solar Storm arrives that from the sun launches very powerful Electromagnetic Waves capable of sending a Total and Worldwide Black-Out, Goodbye Technologies, It happened in 1859 "Carrington Event" that destroyed the telegraph poles, it all caught fire, It happened in 2022 with the low density Power it destroyed 40 of Elon Musk's Satellites, I read an article that if the Solar Storm comes like in 1859 it will destroy all technologies including the Internet, it will take months or even Years to restore everything, we will live with the Calesse, Think Dear! Slogan: "Whoever Adapts to Change, SUCCUMBS!" -Stefered-
This author presents a narrow perspective that echoes similar resistance to technological progress throughout history. Consider the initial rejection of Impressionism by the artistic establishment - a movement enabled by technological advancement (the invention of paint in tubes that allowed artists to work outdoors), just as AI enables new forms of artistic expression today. While we celebrate these works as masterpieces now, at the time, critics too narrow-minded to recognize the dawn of a new artistic age dismissed them as unworthy of being called "art." Imagine if similar voices had prevailed against the printing press - a technology that fundamentally transformed every aspect of human society. We wouldn't even be having this conversation about AI art.
Disruptive technologies reshape our world from top to bottom, with art being just one facet of that transformation. Even within the art world alone, each new tool - from the camera to digital editing software - initially faced skepticism before being embraced as a legitimate medium for creative expression. AI is simply the latest in this long line of innovations. Rather than spelling "the end of art," it represents an expansion of creative possibilities for those willing to explore its potential.
So while critics conduct their insulated debate about the legitimacy of AI as an artistic tool, the point about art is not how it was created - it's whether the result moves, inspires, or challenges us. Throughout history, great art has always been defined by its impact on viewers, not by the tools used to create it.
Artificial Intelligence is not real Art, They have no Soul, Love, Empathy, Creativity (They do not innovate, they only create Colleges), Human Touch and Feelings, Unfortunately you are unaware of the danger you will find yourself in, as you wrote in the Article, it is creating a bubble, when it bursts there will be trouble, Furthermore, Progress can be stopped, indeed, unfortunately history had to teach, but apparently it has not taught anything, A Hacker Attack is enough to stop Progress, they block everything and nothing could happen, everything blocked, This is nothing, there is another thing that can Stop Progress, If a Solar Storm arrives that from the sun launches very powerful Electromagnetic Waves capable of sending a Total and Worldwide Black-Out, Goodbye Technologies, It happened in 1859 "Carrington Event" that destroyed the telegraph poles, it all caught fire, It happened in 2022 with the low density Power it destroyed 40 of Elon Musk's Satellites, I read an article that if the Solar Storm comes like in 1859 it will destroy all technologies including the Internet, it will take months or even Years to restore everything, we will live with the Calesse, Think Dear! Slogan: "Whoever Adapts to Change, SUCCUMBS!" -Stefered-